This analysis makes a good point that Constructivism is better for understanding things like European unity and the Responsibility to Protect. It helps explain how countries’ relationships and identities matter, not just their need for power.

I like how the text explains that Constructivism shows how countries’ actions are influenced by shared values, like with the United Nations or the NPT. This helps us see why countries care about things other than just power.

The text clearly shows that Realism focuses on power, while Constructivism looks at how ideas and beliefs affect how countries act. The examples, like how the U.S. views North Korea, help explain why Constructivism might make more sense today.

I believe constructivism provides a more comprehensive understanding of international relations because it explains how shared norms and identities shape state behavior. Unlike realism, which focuses only on power and self-interest, constructivism helps us understand cooperation, alliances, and the role of international organizations like the UN and EU.

La contaminación es un tema que realmente me preocupa, especialmente cuando veo cómo afecta tanto a nuestro planeta como a nuestra salud. Es una realidad que, aunque muchos estamos conscientes de lo grave que es, aún seguimos contribuyendo a ella de alguna manera. Ya sea por el plástico que usamos y tiramos sin pensar, la cantidad de coches que seguimos manejando todos los días o incluso la contaminación que se genera con la producción de cosas que, a veces, ni necesitamos. Es como si viviéramos en una burbuja de conveniencia y comodidad, ignorando las consecuencias a largo plazo.