the emergence of flamenco árabe is both an unexpected and culturally resonant phenomenon. While the linguistic and historical distance between Spaniards and Arab culture might initially make such fusions seem improbable, the text astutely frames them as a reflection of deeper undercurrents in the sociocultural landscape of southern Spain. The phrase “reunite Andalusian and Arab cultures” is particularly evocative—it gestures toward a historical memory of al-Andalus and a shared musical past that some flamenco artists are now consciously reactivating.

What stood out to me in this paragraph is how external forces, like audience expectations and market demands, don’t just influence how flamenco is performed—they actually shift the internal hierarchy of the tradition itself. For example, the focus on dance over song shows that traditions are not always preserved in their original form, but are reshaped based on what’s popular or profitable. This makes me wonder how much of today’s flamenco is still guided by its original cultural values versus what is demanded by modern entertainment.

I really liked how the author connects changes in flamenco performance—like the rise of solo guitar art—to larger cultural shifts. It shows that flamenco isn’t stuck in the past, but is constantly reinterpreted to reflect the times. The idea that evolving audience tastes can shape musical expression makes me think about how all art forms must balance innovation with tradition. It’s impressive that flamenco can still keep its deep cultural identity even as it adjusts to new formats and settings.

The point about tightened vocal intonation standards suggests a shift from expressive flexibility to technical precision, likely shaped by recording technology and cross-genre comparisons. The increased emphasis on dance in tablaos, catering to tourist preferences, indicates a commercialization that may compromise the traditional balance between cante, baile, and toque.

This paragraph offers an insightful analysis of how flamenco has evolved in response to modern cultural and technological influences. The tightening of vocal intonation standards shows how audience expectations and recording technology have directly shaped the way flamenco is performed. I found the point about the tourist-driven focus on dance especially interesting, as it highlights how economic and social forces can influence artistic traditions. The rise of the solo flamenco guitar as a concert art form is also a powerful example of how flamenco has expanded beyond its traditional boundaries, both in sound and cultural meaning. Overall, this passage reflects a key theme of the article: the tension between preserving flamenco’s roots and adapting to new environments. It made me think about how traditions can stay alive by evolving, rather than resisting change.

The observation that vocal intonation standards have tightened in response to modern audience expectations is particularly compelling—it underscores how broader listening habits and technological advancements (e.g. recording quality) can reshape artistic norms. Additionally, the shift in focus toward dance in tourist-driven venues like tablaos speaks to how external market forces can alter internal stylistic hierarchies within a tradition. Perhaps the most significant change noted is the rise of the solo flamenco guitar as a concert art, which reflects not only a growing appreciation of instrumental virtuosity but also an expansion of flamenco’s expressive range. Together, these developments suggest a dynamic tension between preserving traditional forms and adapting to evolving cultural contexts.

This analysis makes a good point that Constructivism is better for understanding things like European unity and the Responsibility to Protect. It helps explain how countries’ relationships and identities matter, not just their need for power.

I like how the text explains that Constructivism shows how countries’ actions are influenced by shared values, like with the United Nations or the NPT. This helps us see why countries care about things other than just power.

The text clearly shows that Realism focuses on power, while Constructivism looks at how ideas and beliefs affect how countries act. The examples, like how the U.S. views North Korea, help explain why Constructivism might make more sense today.

I believe constructivism provides a more comprehensive understanding of international relations because it explains how shared norms and identities shape state behavior. Unlike realism, which focuses only on power and self-interest, constructivism helps us understand cooperation, alliances, and the role of international organizations like the UN and EU.

this book consistantly deals with this theme of men perceiving women differently in the way they act, I am super interested in this theme and good to see where it goes and what hurtson is trying to say

It is so interesting to see the perspective of how Jody is controlling Janie with her hair and her self representation as a person.

I love the way they describe Hicks as the “average Mortal” it truly shows how discriminatory they were towards blacks at this time and his own attitudes in the situation.

I think you are completely on the money considering where the story is at and it’s understanding, this “untouchable aura” you talk about is extremely prevelent and I think it will be a issue later on.

I keep noticing Hurstons choice of using Ah to represent I in dialogue instead of I itself, I find this super interesting in the characterization of them.

Les clandestines sont un fardeau pour notre pays et nous ne pouvons réflechir! Explusez-les!

Il est facile de pointer du doigt les sans-papiers, mais beaucoup d’entre eux travaillent dur et occupent des emplois essentiels que d’autres refusent de faire. Leur situation est souvent due à des circonstances difficiles, et les traiter avec mépris n’aide en rien. Au lieu de rejeter ces personnes, ne devrions-nous pas chercher des solutions plus justes et humaines ?

La situation de Bakary montre bien à quel point ces lois sont parfois déconnectées de la réalité. Ces personnes travaillent dur, construisent nos villes, mais quand-même, elles sont compares avec des criminels. C’est vrais que il faut des règles, mais ne faudrait-il pas aussi une approche plus humaine, qui tienne compte de leur contribution, de leur situation et du danger qu’elles affrontent au quotidien ?

Comme Bakary Coulibaly, il y a nombreux autres clandestines dans France. Ils ont caché, mais il lentement utilise nos ressources naturelles et il voler nos travails. Les immigrants illégal doit être éliminer de notre pays. Initialement, je l’ai accepté mais la goute d’eau qui a fait débordé la vase, c’est quand j’ai vu un homme africain polluer mon quartier. Cela va sans dire que les sans-papiers sont mal! Qu’est que tu pense?

she turns to the bander log to share her thoughts.

Nanny’s slow, weary nod suggests a deep resignation and understanding, as if she’s seen this story play out before.

Janie’s struggling to express her feelings about Logan Killicks to Nanny. Her silence and pouting convey the pain and frustration she’s experiencing

When I read this Zora’s use of vivvid imagery really creates an image in my mind.I feel like I’m experiencing Janie’s desperation firsthand. She’s fleeing with her baby, still recovering from childbirth, and the thought of navigating that dark, treacherous swamp is terrifying.

To me, this line suggests that women often have to be intentional about what they remember and what they forget, and that can be a way to cope with difficult experiences they’ve had.

As I read the first paragraphs of “Their Eyes Were Watching God,” I get a sense of the calm atmosphere in Eatonville at sundown, which is disrupted by Janie’s return.

I think this situation is very relevant and important, because we tend to forget about these issues. Many times we think that it is not our problem, and the truth is that it is, if we try to raise awareness, we will help these problems decrease.

This is a test

Very interesting article. I found some valuable info pieces, and there are things to think about. I agree that the educational system is not perfect and is “programmed” in a certain way. But I don’t think that it’s the correct thing to say that, in the end, the educational method and each student are the same. A lot of things depend on the student themself. Some educational institutions really inspire curiosity, critical thinking, and self-expression in students, and it is like this. I like my university, but sometimes I feel too pressured by tasks. I use edubirdie.com/pay-for-research-papers from time to time because such theoretical tasks are so time-consuming and complicated, and that time I can dedicate to something I find more useful and interesting.