The author intentionally included Stanley Gartler’s qualifications and his wide spread of influence to 700 other scientists to speak to the reader’s sense of credibility to what is being claimed by the geneticist.

The author is illustrating what it was like for her to write this very book, sharing her own experience as well as what it was like for her and Deborah.

The character Cliff is happy at the idea that white slave owners are buried under their black slaves. After hundreds of thousands suffered and argued the social hierarch. Because of the differences between their skin color. It is the opposite of what was expected to happen. It makes no difference in the after-life. He says: “they spending eternity in the same place”

This paragraph emphasizes how effective HeLa cells are, as well as how they get to the point of affecting things around them.

Even though the insertion of the phrase “seemingly out of nowhere” was abrupt, it actually contributed to more effective communication on how what Cliff is about to say may be surprising and off-putting. Outside of this context, the fact that this phrase has been inserted like that makes the phrase look like it came seemingly out of nowhere from a seemingly ordinary sentence. So it’s a phrase that says “seemingly out of nowhere” that appeared seemingly out of nowhere. This sentence makes the author’s display of information more immersive making the reader feel off-put just like Skloot felt off-put during this moment in conversation.

This points out the media being over eager to get excited about something. Earlier it was said that the cells would make people immortal. Also the “immortal” chicken heart didn’t turn out to be the miracle it was thought to be. “Cell sex” would help scientists out greatly, helping them determine which traits get passed down. I like Skloot starting a sentence with “and.” Its abrupt and gets the reader interested.

Very punchy sentence that holds a lot of emotion. Starting the sentence with a conjunction makes the sentence more impactful in my opinion, but I can’t put my finger on why. When I read this I picture someone sitting away in silence, letting this struggle eat away at them.

The author using this quote, really puts an emphasis on how awful that information really was. Most people would feel disbelief at what was said and it would most certainly feel validating when being told that, the information was complete nonsense.

Skloot uses a lengthier sentence here which appeals to logos. The content inside the sentence is entirely factual and instead of dividing the sentence into smaller bits, Skloot summarizes key information into this sentence. It logically conveys a lot of information in the most efficient and concise way possible.

This sentence is rather interestingly crafted, and it works very well. It begins with saying whom explicitly requires to tell about procedures – doctors. It then uses a semicolon to run into how there was uncertainty if that also applied to researchers who were working with patients who were not their own..

But he withered quickly. The choice to use the word withered about Gey’s condition is a powerful decision. Wither is a word we commonly associate with nature and decomposition. This man was decomposing while he was alive. Frightening stuff.

This makes the situation very dramatic as we can’t tell what the police would do based off of the information provided to them.

The use of a semicolon in this sentence compares what Lawrence and Sonny were doing in their lives. She uses a semicolon to show how similar they are and how they were successful in their lives.

In the sentence, “In 1960, French researchers had discovered that when cells were infected with certain viruses in culture, they clumped together and sometimes fused.”, Skloot chooses to begin the sentence with the specific year of 1960 and provides the French nationality of the researchers, which adds historical context to the paragraph. This use of syntax establishes ethos by presenting the scientific discovery of cell fusion through credible historical evidence.

Write Paper Reviews lacked depth. The https://essayservices.review/reviews/writepaper-com-review seemed inconsistent, making it challenging to gauge service reliability. Expected more detailed evaluations for better decision-making. Room for improvement here.

Paragraph 13 shows a prime example of segregation, revealing how it impacted even basic things in her life, like healthcare. The fact that Henrietta’s blood sample was labeled “COLORED” shows the extreme racism of the time. This shows how racial bias influenced even routine practices. Henrietta’s experience in the hospital, where her body was exploited without regard for her well-being, exemplifies the systemic racism and medical exploitation. The heartbreaking outcome, where her cells died due to contamination, adds to the narrative, emphasizing the dehumanizing practices faced by black communities.

The Yemen civil war, escalating since March 2015, stems from a Saudi-led coalition’s intervention supporting the internationally recognized government against Houthi rebels aligned with former president Ali Abdullah Saleh. I am working on the research paper about the conflict, initially expected to be brief and as I read at https://edubirdie.com/examples/civil-war/ which resulted in significant humanitarian crises, with nearly 100,000 reported deaths, 250,000 people displaced this year alone, and 80% of the population requiring assistance. Despite attempts at power transition and peace talks, the situation remains dire, with geopolitical tensions involving the UK, Saudi-led coalition, and Iran contributing to the complexity of the conflict.

The description of Day appeals to Pathos because it helps us understand Day more and feel emotion toward him.

We see in many of the authors sentences, their choice of using dashed sentences of further detail or evidence. This adds depth to the work, and intrigues the reader to keep reading and further understand the points that the author is trying to portray

This supporting detail providing evidence of the immoral acts allows the reader to fully understand how some of these experiments were carried out without consent. This results in the study to be halted, as the reader can fully understand due to the given evidence

The use of these dashes makes the entirety of this paragraph one sentence. It introduces the ideas of the NIH’s requirements as well as the need to protect the rights of research subjects. Research and testing must be proposed and approved. The dashes add emphasis on the process for this new regulated research.

Skloot uses a dash here to soften the strength of her statement. This statement shows how when people die, their lives can be dug into, and their private information can be shared because they can’t give consent. The dash clarifies that even people with parts of them still alive could have their records dug into and published with no consequences (at least back then). This appeals to logos because the author is showing her knowledge of the legal system back then.

Throughout this chapter and even the whole book, citations are used frequently. These add expert opinions and testimonies which put our minds deeper into the story as if we are there. In this section it helps us feel as if we are in the interview with BBC about Henrietta Lacks.

This paragraph is one long complex sentence explaining the qualification for research funding given by the NIH. Because this is one long sentence, it shows readers the complexity of the situation and it modifies the details of the qualifications into one complete thought instead of a few small segments.

Throughout this whole paragraph, it is just examples of different new sites around the world, articles, and editors talking about how negatively HeLa is expressing the rest of the world.

This first sentence uses commas to fit a lot of information into one singular sentence, without it being a run on sentence. This sentence is able to set the time, place, context, and who was there, all in one. Skloot didn’t have to break this sentence up because she used the proper rules of syntax and was able to make the sentence flow, and have all the important information right there in the start of the chapter.

The author uses short but descriptive sentences about Joe, to quickly build up suspense and a feeling on what is going to happen very soon

I think that in the last half of the paragraph the author uses blunt and short sentences to represent the gravity of Geys Situation. (EXAMPLE: If they did, it might buy him time. Or it might not.) The “Or it might not” is so blunt and forced me to see the severity of the surgery and cancer.

The author uses imagery to show how much pain Henrietta was actually in. This is kind of a hard section to read in the chapter because it makes you feel so bad for her because you can “see” and “feel” what she is going through just through the strong language. The use of pathos in this is also very stagnant. A lot is going on in this section of the book, so to have a clearer image of the exact pain she had experienced really makes us more interested as readers.

Emmet uses hyperbole to describe how Henrietta’s reaction to the pain of her tumors was similar to getting “possessed” as she was tied to the bed to keep her from thrashing onto the floor. He compared that pain to something that the devil might has caused. Emphasizing how much her wail scared him.

I liked how Skloot added semi-colons here to demonstrate how important race is in Clover. In the previous sentence, Skloot says that race is important in Clover, but the semi-colon list causes race to jump at you. By choosing to use a list rather than sentences, it makes the race traits of Clover more noticeable and distinct.

The author’s use of short, choppy sentences gives the feeling of a seemingly empty house. The author didn’t know what was coming stepping into Lawrence’s house, and her use of short sentences like “I yelled hello. Still Nothing.” Convey that eerie sort of feeling. This develops an appeal to the reader’s pathos because everyone knows that eerie feeling of going somewhere empty or abandoned.

Es lamentable la situacion de un pais tan sobrevalorado y con pocos recursos para estas familias, donde debe ser por igual la comunidad, donde los niños tengan donde comer, donde no haya racismo para poder tener la necesidad que todo humano tiene y el racismo no sea un problema, cabe resaltar que los precios de los alimentos sobrepasan el límite de las personas con bajos recursos, el tener empatía hace que tengas consideración en los demás y estados unidos esta fuera de ello.

I find it interesting that the author mentions all of the reasons why humans are terrible research subjects; including mating with anyone we choose, breeding ways, and how cells are passed along. I find it interesting that it isn’t mentioned the fact that it is incredibly immoral to test humans, ex. the Mengele twins experiments. I understand they may be referring to the study of human cells, but it seems a bit unethical to mention it in this way.

By saying he did this and he did that we feel like we are seeing him go on and on doing bad things. This gives the opinion that he keeps on doing rebelious things.

Today many different music genres are born, including rap music. Rap music is a diverse genre, used to express many realities and aspirations that have a great impact on today’s youth and attract many people. This is a modern music genre with a very different style. https://skibidi-toilet.io/

Rap music has raised social consciousness in communities across the country. Rap music has been used to raise awareness to unpleasant aspects of life, https://suikagamepc.com such as violence and guns. Many musicians use their musical abilities to promote peace and nonviolent activities.

This comment by Henrietta’s cousin concerns the reader’s morals and makes them stop to think a bit. The passage answers its own question, but that only serves to give more thought about the scenario. Henrietta is dead, but her cells are living in test tubes, being used for all sorts of things. Fred’s comment from the documentary being included in the story, despite not providing any new insight on Henrietta Lacks, is a purposeful decision to appeal to the reader’s sense of morality and have them think about Henrietta’s family.

The blunt language of this passage serves to contrast the hope built up in the preceding paragraphs. It seems almost ironic that this sense of hope is being built up, and immediately snatched away when it is revealed Henrietta is infertile. Saying “things weren’t all good” is a clear appeal to the reader’s emotions, as it may be the most blunt way to get the reader to feel a certain way.

This shows the escalation of Hennritta’s cancer and emphasizes how severe it was.

Glad to find thist example essay. It’s inspiring. It took me a long time to get in the mood to write an essay on psychology. I even found essay writing service https://yhoo.it/45VeLcr where I asked for help. And already got my written essay.